![]() If my machines specs are the issue, here they are: It going out of business might be the perfect time for me to replace it with an open source solution Hugin was the first software I tried many years back and it just didn’t work for me at all and that’s why I went with Autopano in the first place. I have to say, I’m so amazed that it worked so well for you two. Assuming I get it to work on a new build or find a bug and a dev willing to fix it ofc. The worst that can happen is, some other company filling the vacuum with another proprietary thank you so much to taking the time to test this out and to give me some useful info You guys are saints.Ītm, I cannot get the thing to work correctly for me but I’m in the process of making a new PC build, so when I’m done I’ll be testing this heavily and judging by the results you two have presented me with, I think I might put Hugin as a default in my pipeline. One could start simply with petition for GoPro to release the source and then gradually increasing the pressure trough emails, forums and social media. And I’ll go even further to say that an opensource alternatives will not be up to pair with Autopano for 10 years+.Ī) somehow convince GoPro to release the source,ī) raise the funds to buy the software and release it as gplĬ) get a hold of some of the original developers to see if they are up for recreating the tech but in gpl, provided there is a way that they or the new project doesn’t get into a legal trouble. I’ve been doing this for a few years now and my verdict is that there is no software suitable for Panorama stitching at scale at the moment. PtGUI is similar to hugin, gives somewhat better results but not even close to Autopano. It failed to autodetect points so hard that it’s not even funny. I’ve tried Hugin yesterday with 16 jpg images to create a 360*180 panorama for VR purposes. Hemifisheye is really a unique projection.Nope, but since it’s proprietary there is no way to add support for the new cameras, raw files and new lenses. It is also great for architecture.Īnyway: the end result is better than any of the projections in PTgui. I remove that FE effect in Adobe Elements with the "HemiFisheye" plugin that is the worlds best filter at defishing: it leaves peoples shape and faces intact even near the edges. The latter produces a panorama (usually at most 4 - 5 shots) with a heavy fish eye effect. Recently I have found that when I stitch a row of format-filling, portrait orientation fisheye images (sigma 15mm F2.8 on Nikon D800) I get a better result of the top of trees by exporting using the "full Frame Fisheye" projection: The tops of trees curve a lot away when using Mercator - and much less when using"Full frame fisheye" projection. I must admit I have not explored how all these work - I just use the "mask" tool to shift seams if I do not like their initial, default placement. PTgui has a lot of push-buttons for various projections plus you can use the freeware enblend, smartblend and autopana as plugins - the last they think at PTgui is obsolete now - I don't know why.Īlso the Panoramatools application "PTOptimizer" and the "PTstitcherNG" application. 24mm on full frame, it wasn't wide enough. I've put some images of West Wycombe church and the final stitch on my flickr page and I'd be interested how other programs stitch them, but I was staggered when I first did this. The other interesting thing it does is to take pictures of buildings that seem undo-able and sorts them out. I've never looked further than AP, so cannot say about the others but APP gives you a push button choice of projection so you can chose what looks best.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |